Wednesday, 24 July 2013

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S ECONOMIC SPEECH AT KNOX COLLEGE



Earlier today, President Barack Obama delivered the first in a series of speeches regarding the economy. Text provided at this link and below.




Eight years ago, I came here to deliver the commencement address for the class of 2005.  Things were a little different back then.  I didn’t have any gray hair, for example.  Or a motorcade.  I didn’t even have a teleprompter.  It was my first big speech as your newest senator, and I spent my time talking about what a changing economy was doing to the middle class – and what we, as a country, needed to do to give every American a chance to get ahead in the 21st century.

You see, I’d just spent a year traveling this state and listening to your stories – of proud Maytag workers losing their jobs when their plant moved down to Mexico; of teachers whose salaries weren’t keeping up with the rising cost of groceries; of young people who had the drive but not the money to afford a college education.

They were the stories of families who worked hard and believed in the American Dream, but felt that the odds were increasingly stacked against them.  And they were right.

In the period after World War II, a growing middle class was the engine of our prosperity.  Whether you owned a company, swept its floors, or worked anywhere in between, this country offered you a basic bargain – a sense that your hard work would be rewarded with fair wages and benefits, the chance to buy a home, to save for retirement, and, above all, to hand down a better life for your kids.

But over time, that engine began to stall.  That bargain began to fray.  Technology made some jobs obsolete.  Global competition sent others overseas.  It became harder for unions to fight for the middle class. Washington doled out bigger tax cuts to the rich and smaller minimum wage increases for the working poor. The link between higher productivity and people’s wages and salaries was severed – the income of the top 1% nearly quadrupled from 1979 to 2007, while the typical family’s barely budged.

Towards the end of those three decades, a housing bubble, credit cards, and a churning financial sector kept the economy artificially juiced up.  But by the time I took office in 2009, the bubble had burst, costing millions of Americans their jobs, their homes, and their savings.  The decades-long erosion of middle-class security was laid bare for all to see and feel.

Today, five years after the start of that Great Recession, America has fought its way back.

Together, we saved the auto industry, took on a broken health care system, and invested in new American technologies to reverse our addiction to foreign oil and double wind and solar power.

Together, we put in place tough new rules on big banks, and protections that cracked down on the worst practices of mortgage lenders and credit card companies.  We changed a tax code too skewed in favor of the wealthiest at the expense of working families, locking in tax cuts for 98% of Americans, and asking those at the top to pay a little more.

Add it all up, and over the past 40 months, our businesses have created 7.2 million new jobs.  This year, we are off to our strongest private-sector job growth since 1999.  And because we bet on this country, foreign companies are, too.  Right now, more of Honda’s cars are made in America than anywhere else.  Airbus will build new planes in Alabama.  Companies like Ford are replacing outsourcing with insourcing and bringing more jobs home.  We sell more products made in America to the rest of the world than ever before.  We now produce more natural gas than any country on Earth.  We’re about to produce more of our own oil than we buy from abroad for the first time in nearly 20 years.  The cost of health care is growing at its slowest rate in 50 years.  And our deficits are falling at the fastest rate in 60 years.

Thanks to the grit and resilience of the American people, we’ve cleared away the rubble from the financial crisis and begun to lay a new foundation for stronger, more durable economic growth.  In our personal lives, we tightened our belts, shed debt, and refocused on the things that really matter.  As a country, we’ve recovered faster and gone further than most other advanced nations in the world.  With new American revolutions in energy, technology, manufacturing, and health care, we are actually poised to reverse the forces that have battered the middle class for so long, and rebuild an economy where everyone who works hard can get ahead.

But I’m here today to tell you what you already know – we’re not there yet.  Even though our businesses are creating new jobs and have broken record profits, nearly all the income gains of the past ten years have continued to flow to the top 1%.  The average CEO has gotten a raise of nearly 40% since 2009, but the average American earns less than he or she did in 1999.  And companies continue to hold back on hiring those who have been out of work for some time.

Today, more students are earning their degree, but soaring costs saddle them with unsustainable debt.  Health care costs are slowing, but many working families haven’t seen the savings yet.  And while the stock market rebound has helped families get back much of what they lost in their 401ks, millions of Americans still have no idea how they’ll ever be able to retire.  In many ways, the trends that I spoke of here in 2005 – of a winner-take-all economy where a few do better and better, while everybody else just treads water – have been made worse by the recession.

This growing inequality isn’t just morally wrong; it’s bad economics.  When middle-class families have less to spend, businesses have fewer customers. When wealth concentrates at the very top, it can inflate unstable bubbles that threaten the economy.  When the rungs on the ladder of opportunity grow farther apart, it undermines the very essence of this country.

That’s why reversing these trends must be Washington’s highest priority.  It’s certainly my highest priority.  Unfortunately, over the past couple of years in particular, Washington hasn’t just ignored the problem; too often, it’s made things worse.

We’ve seen a sizable group of Republican lawmakers suggest they wouldn’t vote to pay the very bills that Congress rang up – a fiasco that harmed a fragile recovery in 2011, and one we can’t afford to repeat.  Then, rather than reduce our deficits with a scalpel – by cutting programs we don’t need, fixing ones we do, and making government more efficient – this same group has insisted on leaving in place a meat cleaver called the sequester that has cost jobs, harmed growth, hurt our military, and gutted investments in American education and scientific and medical research that we need to make this country a magnet for good jobs.

Over the last six months, this gridlock has gotten worse.  A growing number of Republican Senators are trying to get things done, like an immigration bill that economists say will boost our economy by more than a trillion dollars.  But a faction of Republicans in the House won’t even give that bill a vote, and gutted a farm bill that America’s farmers and most vulnerable children depend on.

If you ask some of these Republicans about their economic agenda, or how they’d strengthen the middle class, they’ll shift the topic to “out-of-control” government spending – despite the fact that we have cut the deficit by nearly half as a share of the economy since I took office.  Or they’ll talk about government assistance for the poor, despite the fact that they’ve already cut early education for vulnerable kids and insurance for people who’ve lost their jobs through no fault of their own.  Or they’ll bring up Obamacare, despite the fact that our businesses have created nearly twice as many jobs in this recovery as they had at the same point in the last recovery, when there was no Obamacare.

With an endless parade of distractions, political posturing and phony scandals, Washington has taken its eye off the ball.  And I am here to say this needs to stop.  Short-term thinking and stale debates are not what this moment requires.  Our focus must be on the basic economic issues that the matter most to you – the people we represent.  And as Washington prepares to enter another budget debate, the stakes for our middle class could not be higher.  The countries that are passive in the face of a global economy will lose the competition for good jobs and high living standards.  That’s why America has to make the investments necessary to promote long-term growth and shared prosperity.  Rebuilding our manufacturing base.  Educating our workforce.  Upgrading our transportation and information networks.  That’s what we need to be talking about.  That’s what Washington needs to be focused on.

And that’s why, over the next several weeks, in towns across this country, I will engage the American people in this debate.  I will lay out my ideas for how we build on the cornerstones of what it means to be middle class in America, and what it takes to work your way into the middle class in America.  Job security, with good wages and durable industries.  A good education.  A home to call your own.  Affordable health care when you get sick.  A secure retirement even if you’re not rich.  Reducing poverty and inequality.  Growing prosperity and opportunity.

Some of these ideas I’ve talked about before, and some will be new.  Some will require Congress, and some I will pursue on my own.  Some will benefit folks right away; some will take years to fully implement.  But the key is to break through the tendency in Washington to careen from crisis to crisis.  What we need isn’t a three-month plan, or even a three-year plan, but a long-term American strategy, based on steady, persistent effort, to reverse the forces that have conspired against the middle class for decades.

Of course, we’ll keep pressing on other key priorities, like reducing gun violence, rebalancing our fight against al Qaeda, combating climate change, and standing up for civil rights and women’s rights.  But if we don’t have a growing, thriving middle class, we won’t have the resources or the resolve; the optimism or sense of unity that we need to solve these other issues.

In this effort, I will look to work with Republicans as well as Democrats wherever I can.  I believe there are members of both parties who understand what’s at stake, and I will welcome ideas from anyone, from across the political spectrum.  But I will not allow gridlock, inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.  Whatever executive authority I have to help the middle class, I’ll use it.  Where I can’t act on my own, I’ll pick up the phone and call CEOs, and philanthropists, and college presidents – anybody who can help – and enlist them in our efforts.  Because the choices that we, the people, make now will determine whether or not every American will have a fighting chance in the 21st century.

Let me give you a quick preview of what I’ll be fighting for and why.

The first cornerstone of a strong and growing middle class has to be an economy that generates more good jobs in durable, growing industries.  Over the past four years, for the first time since the 1990s, the number of American manufacturing jobs hasn’t gone down; they’ve gone up.  But we can do more.  So I’ll push new initiatives to help more manufacturers bring more jobs back to America.  We’ll continue to focus on strategies to create good jobs in wind, solar, and natural gas that are lowering energy costs and dangerous carbon pollution.  And I’ll push to open more manufacturing innovation institutes that turn regions left behind by global competition into global centers of cutting-edge jobs.  Let’s tell the world that America is open for business – including an old site right here in Galesburg, over on Monmouth Boulevard.

Tomorrow, I’ll also visit the port of Jacksonville, Florida to offer new ideas for doing what America has always done best: building things.  We’ve got ports that aren’t ready for the new supertankers that will begin passing through the new Panama Canal in two years’ time.  We’ve got more than 100,000 bridges that are old enough to qualify for Medicare.  Businesses depend on our transportation systems, our power grids, our communications networks – and rebuilding them creates good-paying jobs that can’t be outsourced.  And yet, as a share of our economy, we invest less in our infrastructure than we did two decades ago.  That’s inefficient at a time when it’s as cheap as it’s been since the 1950s.  It’s inexcusable at a time when so many of the workers who do this for a living sit idle.  The longer we put this off, the more expensive it will be, and the less competitive we will be.  The businesses of tomorrow won’t locate near old roads and outdated ports; they’ll relocate to places with high-speed internet; high-tech schools; systems that move air and auto traffic faster, not to mention get parents home to their kids faster.  We can watch that happen in other countries, or we can choose to make it happen right here, in America.

In an age when jobs know no borders, companies will also seek out the country that boasts the most talented citizens, and reward them with good pay.  The days when the wages for a worker with a high-school degree could keep pace with the earnings of someone who got some higher education are over.  Technology and global competition aren’t going away.  So we can either throw up our hands and resign ourselves to diminished living standards, or we can do what America has always done: adapt, pull together, fight back and win.

Which brings me to the second cornerstone of a strong middle class: an education that prepares our children and our workers for the global competition they’ll face.

If you think education is expensive, wait until you see how much ignorance costs in the 21st century.  If we don’t make this investment, we’ll put our kids, our workers, and our country at a competitive disadvantage for decades.  So we must begin in the earliest years.  That’s why I’ll keep pushing to make high-quality preschool available to every four year-old in America – not just because we know it works for our kids, but because it provides a vital support system for working parents.  I’ll also take action to spur innovation in our schools that don’t require Congress.  Today, for example, federal agencies are moving on my plan to connect 99% of America’s students to high-speed internet over the next five years. And we’ve begun meeting with business leaders, tech entrepreneurs, and innovative educators to identify the best ideas for redesigning our high schools so that they teach the skills required for a high-tech economy.

We’ll also keep pushing new efforts to train workers for changing jobs. Here in Galesburg, many of the workers laid off at Maytag chose to enroll in retraining programs like the ones at Carl Sandburg College.  And while it didn’t pay off for everyone, many who retrained found jobs that suited them even better and paid even more. That’s why I asked Congress to start a Community College to Career initiative, so that workers can earn the skills that high-tech jobs demand without leaving their hometown.  And I’m challenging CEOs from some of America’s best companies to hire more Americans who’ve got what it takes to fill that job opening, but have been laid off so long no one will give their resume an honest look.

I’m also going to use the power of my office over the next few months to highlight a topic that’s straining the budgets of just about every American family – the soaring cost of higher education.

Three years ago, I worked with Democrats to reform the student loan system so that taxpayer dollars stopped padding the pockets of big banks, and instead helped more kids afford college. I capped loan repayments at 10% of monthly income for responsible borrowers.  And this week, we’re working with both parties to reverse the doubling of student loan rates that occurred a few weeks ago because of Congressional inaction.

It’s all a good start – but it isn’t enough.  Families and taxpayers can’t just keep paying more and more into an undisciplined system; we’ve got to get more out of what we pay for.  Some colleges are testing new approaches to shorten the path to a degree, or blending teaching with online learning to help students master material and earn credits in less time.  Some states are testing new ways to fund college based not just on how many students enroll, but how well they do. This afternoon, I’ll visit the University of Central Missouri to highlight their efforts to deliver more bang for the buck.  And in the coming months, I will lay out an aggressive strategy to shake up the system, tackle rising costs, and improve value for middle-class students and their families.

Now, if a good job and a good education have always been key stepping stones into the middle class, a home of your own has been the clearest expression of middle-class security.  That changed during the crisis, when millions of middle-class families saw their home values plummet.  Over the past four years, we’ve helped more responsible homeowners stay in their homes, and today, sales are up, prices are up, and fewer Americans see their homes underwater.

But we’re not done yet.  The key now is to encourage homeownership that isn’t based on bubbles, but is instead based on a solid foundation, where buyers and lenders play by the same set of rules, rules that are clear, transparent, and fair.  Already, I’ve asked Congress to pass a good, bipartisan idea – one that was championed by Mitt Romney’s economic advisor – to give every homeowner the chance to refinance their mortgage and save thousands of dollars a year.  I’m also acting on my own to cut red tape for responsible families who want to get a mortgage, but the bank says no.  And we’ll work with both parties to turn the page on Fannie and Freddie, and build a housing finance system that’s rock-solid for future generations.

Along with homeownership, the fourth cornerstone of what it means to be middle class in this country is a secure retirement.  Unfortunately, over the past decade, too many families watched their retirement recede from their grasp.  Today, a rising stock market has millions of retirement balances rising.  But we still live with an upside-down system where those at the top get generous tax incentives to save, while tens of millions of hardworking Americans get none at all. As we work to reform our tax code, we should find new ways to make it easier for workers to put money away, and free middle-class families from the fear that they’ll never be able to retire.  And if Congress is looking for a bipartisan place to get started, they don’t have to look far: economists show that immigration reform that makes undocumented workers pay their full share of taxes would actually shore up Social Security for years.

Fifth, I will keep focusing on health care, because middle-class families and small business owners deserve the security of knowing that neither illness nor accident should threaten the dreams you’ve worked a lifetime to build.

As we speak, we are well on our way to fully implementing the Affordable Care Act.  If you’re one of the 85% of Americans who already have health insurance, you’ve got new benefits and better protections you didn’t have before, like free checkups and mammograms and discounted medicine on Medicare.  If you don’t have health insurance, starting October 1st, private plans will actually compete for your business.  You can comparison shop in an online marketplace, just like you would for TVs or plane tickets, and buy the one that fits your budget and is right for you.  And if you’re in the up to half of all Americans who’ve been sick or have a preexisting condition, this law means that that beginning January 1st, insurance companies finally have to cover you, and at the same rates they charge everybody else.

Now, I know there are folks out there who are actively working to make this law fail.  But despite a politically-motivated misinformation campaign, the states that have committed themselves to making this law work are finding that competition and choice are actually pushing costs down.  Just last week, New York announced that premiums for consumers who buy their insurance in these online marketplaces will be at least 50% less than what they pay today.  That’s right – folks’ premiums in the individual market will drop by 50%.  For them, and for the millions of Americans who have been able to cover their sick kids for the first time, or have been able to cover their employees more cheaply, or who will be getting tax breaks to afford insurance for the first time – you will have the security of knowing that everything you’ve worked hard for is no longer one illness away from being wiped out.

Finally, as we work to strengthen these cornerstones of middle-class security, I’m going to make the case for why we need to rebuild ladders of opportunity for all those Americans still trapped in poverty.  Here in America, we’ve never guaranteed success.  More than some other countries, we expect people to be self-reliant, and we’ve tolerated a little more inequality for the sake of a more dynamic, more adaptable economy.  But that’s always been combined with a commitment to upward mobility – the idea that no matter how poor you started, you can make it with hard work and discipline.

Unfortunately, opportunities for upward mobility in America have gotten harder to find over the past 30 years.  That’s a betrayal of the American idea.  And that’s why we have to do a lot more to give every American the chance to work their way into the middle class.

The best defense against all of these forces – global competition and economic polarization – is the strength of community.  We need a new push to rebuild run-down neighborhoods.  We need new partnerships with some of the hardest-hit towns in America to get them back on their feet.  And because no one who works full-time in America should have to live in poverty, I will keep making the case that we need to raise a minimum wage that in real terms is lower than it was when Ronald Reagan took office.  We are not a people who allow chance of birth to decide life’s big winners and losers; and after years in which we’ve seen how easy it can be for any of us to fall on hard times, we cannot turn our backs when bad breaks hit any of our fellow citizens.

Good jobs.  A better bargain for the middle class and folks working to join it.  An economy that grows from the middle-out.  This is where I will focus my energies – not just over the next few months, but for the remainder of my presidency.  These are the plans that I will lay out across this country.  But I won’t be able to do it alone, and I’ll be calling on all of us to take up this cause.

We’ll need our businesses, the best in the world, to pressure Congress to invest in our future, and set an example by providing decent wages and salaries to their own employees.  And I’ll highlight the ones that do just that – companies like Costco, which pays good wages and offers good benefits; or the Container Store, which prides itself on training its workers and on employee satisfaction – because these companies prove that this isn’t just good for their business, it’s good for America.

We’ll need Democrats to question old assumptions, be willing to redesign or get rid of programs that no longer work, and embrace changes to cherished priorities so that they work better in this new age.  For if we believe that government can give the middle class a fair shot in this new century, we have an obligation to prove it.

And we’ll need Republicans in Congress to set aside short-term politics and work with me to find common ground.  The fact is, there are Republicans in Congress right now who privately agree with me on many of the ideas I’ll be proposing, but worry they’ll face swift political retaliation for saying so.  Others will dismiss every idea I put forward either because they’re playing to their most strident supporters, or because they have a fundamentally different vision for America – one that says inequality is both inevitable and just; one that says an unfettered free market without any restraints inevitably produces the best outcomes, regardless of the pain and uncertainty imposed on ordinary families.

In either case, I say to these members of Congress: I am laying out my ideas to give the middle class a better shot.  Now it’s time for you to lay out yours.  If you’re willing to work with me to strengthen American manufacturing and rebuild this country’s infrastructure, let’s go.  If you have better ideas to bring down the cost of college for working families, let’s hear them.  If you think you have a better plan for making sure every American has the security of quality, affordable health care, stop taking meaningless repeal votes and share your concrete ideas with the country.  If you are serious about a balanced, long-term fiscal plan that replaces the mindless cuts currently in place, or tax reform that closes corporate loopholes and gives working families a better deal, I’m ready to work – but know that I will not accept deals that do not meet the test of strengthening the prospects of hard-working families.

We’ve come a long way since I first took office.  As a country, we’re older and we’re wiser.  And as long as Congress doesn’t manufacture another crisis – as long as we don’t shut down the government just as the economy is getting traction, or risk a U.S. default over paying bills we’ve already racked up – we can probably muddle along without taking bold action.  Our economy will grow, though slower than it should; new businesses will form, and unemployment will keep ticking down.  Just by virtue of our size and our natural resources and the talent of our people, America will remain a world power, and the majority of us will figure out how to get by.

But if that’s our choice – if we just stand by and do nothing in the face of immense change – understand that an essential part of our character will be lost.  Our founding precept about wide-open opportunity and each generation doing better than the last will be a myth, not reality. The position of the middle class will erode further.  Inequality will continue to increase, and money’s power will distort our politics even more.  Social tensions will rise, as various groups fight to hold on to what they have, and the fundamental optimism that has always propelled us forward will give way to cynicism or nostalgia.

That’s not the vision I have for this country.  That’s not the vision you have for this country.  That is not the America we know.  That’s not a vision we should settle for, or pass on to our children.  I have now run my last campaign.  I do not intend to wait until the next one before tackling the issues that matter.  I care about one thing and one thing only, and that’s how to use every minute of the 1,276 days remaining in my term to make this country work for working Americans again.  Because I believe this is where America needs to go.  I believe this is where the American people want to go.  It may seem hard today, but if we are willing to take a few bold steps – if Washington will just shake off its complacency and set aside the kind of slash-and-burn partisanship we’ve seen these past few years – our economy will be stronger a year from now.  And five years from now.  And ten years from now.  More Americans will know the pride of that first paycheck; the satisfaction of flipping the sign to “Open” on their own business; the joy of etching a child’s height into the door of their brand new home.

After all, what makes us special has never been our ability to generate incredible wealth for the few, but our ability to give everyone a chance to pursue their own true measure of happiness. We haven’t just wanted success for ourselves – we’ve wanted it for our neighbors, too.  That’s why we don’t call it John’s dream or Susie’s dream or Barack’s dream – we call it the American Dream. That’s what makes this country special – the idea that no matter who you are, what you look like, where you come from or who you love – you can make it if you try.

One of America’s greatest writers, Carl Sandburg, was born right here in Galesburg over a century ago.  He saw the railroad bring the world to the prairie, and the prairie send its bounty to the world.  He saw the advent of bustling new industries and technologies; he watched populations shift; he saw fortunes made and lost.  He saw how change could be painful – how a new age could unsettle long-settled customs and ways of life.  But possessed with a frontier optimism, he saw something more on the horizon.  “I speak of new cities and new people,” he wrote.  “…The past is a bucket of ashes…yesterday is a wind gone down, a sun dropped in the west…there is…only an ocean of tomorrows, a sky of tomorrows.”

America, we have made it through the worst of yesterday’s winds.  And if we find the courage to keep moving forward; if we set our eyes on the horizon, we too will find an ocean of tomorrows, a sky of tomorrows – for America’s people, and for this great country that we love.

Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

Sunday, 21 July 2013

BULLIES





Texas passed its omnibus anti-choice legislation one week ago by a vote of 19-11 in the State Senate. This last Thursday Governor Rick Perry (R) signed it.

At the same time the US House approved a farm bill without funding food stamps by a vote of 216-208. The debate was heated with Democrats accusing Republicans of dismissing low income Americans while Republicans did what they could do stifle vocal opposition.

These two polices passed by Republicans at the state level in Texas and the national level are summed up by Rachel Maddow's quotein her analysis of President Obama's re-election speech as she was commenting about what the real political divisions in this country are.
The biggest political divide in this country is not between Democrats and Republicans, it's between who care and people who don't.
Republicans do not care about the rest of their constituents.

They only care about those that participate in the Republican Primary and those that fund their campaigns.

My State Rep, State Senator, US House Member, and US Senators do not care about me. I didn't vote for them, but I expect that they would hear me out because they were elected to represent me. Honestly, they don't represent the interests of me or my friends that fall into the same category as me.

I reached that conclusion during the Texas Senate's HB 2 debate.

During the debate, Senate Democrats offered 20 amendments to try to lessen the blow of the proposed legislation and back to the House for reconsideration. Among those amendments were restoring funding to the cuts to family planning services and education that happened in the 82nd session to teaching age appropriate comprehensive sex education to Senator Wendy Davis's "Equal Pay for Equal Work" proposal.

All 20 amendments were tabled.

By the end of that night, the bill passed as expected.

This special session is nothing more than an opportunity for the very vocal minority of Tea Party Republicans to push forward their agenda and to prevent some legislators from seeing a formidable primary challenger in 2014. State level Republicans know they are going to get hammered on issues such as the budget and not pushing enough of an extreme agenda by their base.
I later expanded on that observation in the days after Senator Davis's filibuster at the end of the first special session.

One of the reasons for passing this anti-choice omnibus bill was the argument coming from Republicans saying that fetuses feel pain at 20 weeks. I asked this question via twitter:


I had a few responses to this tweet. They were from your stereotypical right-wing Tea Partier types. What did I do?

Blocked them.

The fetal pain theory is bunk(among OTHER anti-choice theories that are circulating the so called "pro-life" movement and Republican politics). A British study says that fetuses cannot feel pain until 24 weeks while an American study says it is much later at 28 weeks. The reason for these findings is that fetuses' have not developed the nervous system to feel pain.

Also, a 2005 study by the Centers For Disease Control published that less than 1.3% of all abortions occur after 21 weeks.

Or in other words, science.

Another issue that Texas Republicans are claiming is that they want to make health care for women safer.

So how safe are abortions in Texas? 22% of abortions in Texaswere preformed in facilities classified as ambulatory surgical centers while the rest were preformed in clinics that don't meet HB 2's standards. According to the health department, the type of clinic has no impact on safety where the abortion is preformed.

HB 2 was not based on sound science or making health care for women safer. Instead it will punish poor women and women of color as they seek unsafe alternative methods to terminate a pregnancy such as purchasing abortion inducing drugs on the Black Market or worse... going to medical providers who will butcher a woman.

I know I have said it once in prior entries, but it is worth repeating.

HB 2's passage was nothing more than political gamesmanship to satisfy the rabid Tea Party base going into the 2014 elections. Texas Republicans pushed their luck and they have lost. There is a sense of anger among people on my side of the aisle and we have had enough. This could be the beginning of the end of the Republican Party's almost 20-year hold on Texas politics.

Back to my question that I tweeted asking about how can Texas Republicans care about fetus pain but not about the hunger pains of a child.

The Republican Party claims to be the party of "pro-life." There is a catch... they only care about you if you are a fetus. After you are born, you are on your own.


As shown with the farm bill, House Republicans passed a bill that gave subsidies to farmers and big agriculture businesses but no funding to food stamps. It is not just food stamps. Here in Texas, our legislature cut education funding. There is the issue of fracking which raises concerns about the quantity and quality of our water supply. And of course, for the 38th and 39th time, the House GOP voted to repeal ObamaCare. Meanwhile 1 out of 4 Texans are without healthcare coverage. Then there is the issue of that Republicans are refusing to taking on gun reform legislation because the NRA has them by their collective testicles threatens to run NRA backed candidates against them.

Oh and Lege Republicans have filed this bill, The Fetal Heartbeat Bill, that would criminalize an abortion where a heartbeat is detected. The bill is classified as "trigger" legislation meaning it will only take effect if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade (1973).

The bill was filed within minutes of Governor Perry signing HB 2.

So... back to the title of this entry.

My fellow Democrats/Liberal minded people can present Republicans with the facts and we can write letters, tweet them, call them, and show up physically to their offices in their district and the capitol building.


We can hold marches and yell and scream at them to vote for a position that we advocate, but as shown with the votes in The Lege and the US House, those actions did not sway their opinion.


You would think that when a crowd of this size....


from WITHIN TEXAS shows up to the Pink Dome in Austin, that Republicans in The Lege would stop and think about what they are doing.

But as shown with their votes, we don't matter to them.

When Republican politicians return to their districts the moment the Special Session adjourns sine die, they will brag about how they passed this anti-choice bill. The only thing these politicians will be proud about is they have something to shelter themselves going into the 2014 Republican Primaries which will be brutal for them. Other than that, this legislation does nothing to curb Texas's exploding teen birth rate. The Lege did nothing to ensure that future generations of Texans have access to health care with their constant moaning about how ObamaCare is an unfunded mandate (and HB 2 isn't?). And most telling is they didn't fully restore the education cuts that took place during the 82nd session and were unwilling to listen to Democrats proposals to make Texas a better state.

The sad part is they refused to listen to the voices of the victims of sexual assault who were traumatized by their experiences. Or the women who experienced a wide range of complications during their pregnancies that not only endangered the well-being and formation of the fetus but also jeopardized future pregnancies and in some instances endangered the health of the mother.


Because of their unwillingness to listen to the marginalized and only listening to the most extreme voices in their party, Republicans will pay a heavy price at the election booth come November 2014.




Eventually, we will stand up to these bullies.


Wednesday, 17 July 2013

GEORGE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL VERDICT




On Saturday Night, a jury of 6 women in Sanford, FL found George Zimmerman not guilty in the second-degree murder of 17-year old Trayvon Martin.



The verdict has sparked outrage from my political connections and across twitter. I needed few days to process my thoughts about this case and sift through the commentary/opinions to get the facts in order to formulate my own opinion about this.

In all honesty I have not been following this case that closely because of the issues surrounding Texas politics.

Though from what I have been hearing and reading about the case, this was mishandled from the start. The prosecution did a poor job in presenting its case, and they got a little star struck given the attention that this case garnered nationally. The trial was aired every day on cable news and I refused to watch it. I have never been a fan of "trial-by-media." I remember the O.J. Simpson trial and how that devolved into a media circus over the course of the trial. The job of the prosecution is not to convince the people at home watching the case. Their job was to convince the jury and they failed to do that.

The defense claimed that it was Trayvon Martin who attacked George Zimmerman.

First, Martin was 17 and Zimmerman is 29. Zimmerman was the adult and should have had the better judgment to not pursue Trayvon Martin. Enough said.

Second, there is the 911 call that Zimmerman made before the chaos that ensued. On the
audio to the Sanford Police Department, the dispatcher tells Zimmerman not to pursue Martin. Zimmerman clearly disobeyed those orders and at that point went from observer to pursuer.

Sadly, our justice system is set up so that everyone is entitled to defend themselves in a court of law. It just doesn't say HOW that defense strategy is formulated. I've had a couple of people tell me I should go to law school. This is one of the reasons why I could not be a lawyer. The defense went with the strategy of slandering the victim's character. Did Martin post some questionable things on social media as some were claiming during the course of the trial? Perhaps, but that is not the whole story.

Show of hands... who among us exhibited questionable behavior as teenagers? My mom is probably reading this... Senior year, I once snuck out of the house late at night to walk around the neighborhood. I cut school and I was late to classes. Still graduated high school with above a 3.25 GPA.

On the night of his murder, Martin was watching the NBA All-Star Game because he enjoyed sports. He was describedas an A-B student who enjoyed fixing things and dreamed of a career in the aviation field. Martin enjoyed math.

I might have to resort to shaming a victim who is unable to defend him/herself, like Trayvon Martin, in order to get my client an acquittal. There is no honor in that.

The YouTube Channel LiberalViewer presented the possible reasons why the jury found George Zimmerman not guilty.


One thing that stood out was from the jury instructions as the video pointed out (text is on the bottom of Page 12, top Page 13):

If in your consideration of the issue of self-defense you have a reasonable doubt on the question of whether George Zimmerman was justified in the use of deadly force, you should find George Zimmerman not guilty

However, if from the evidence you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that George Zimmerman was not justified in the use of deadly force, you should find him guilty if all the elements of the charge have been proved.

George Zimmerman was not justified in using deadly force. It turns out that the only items on Trayvon Martin's person was a can of iced tea and a bag of Skittles. The defense made their case that Zimmerman was defending himself, but what about the victim? Didn't he have a right to protect himself when he felt threatened by Zimmerman pursuing him? This has also brought Florida's controversial "Stand Your Ground" legislation into the spotlight. Though this wasn't invoked in the case, it turns out the jury was considering it during deliberations.

It is one thing to defend yourself; it is a totally different topic when you go looking for trouble. Zimmerman fell into the latter category the moment he disregarded the 911 operator's instructions to not pursue.

Oh, and it would be wrong to not mention this case. Marrisa Alexander, a Florida woman, fired warning shots into the wall because her husband had a history of domestic abuse towards her. No one was killed. Under the "Stand Your Ground" statute, you would think that she was justified in defending herself. However the judge rejected that defense. She was put on trial, and within 20 minutes the jury returned a guilty verdict. Because she was charged under Florida's "10-20-life" law, Alexander received 20 years in prison for discharging a firearm during a crime regardless of the circumstances. There are some efforts to try to get her an appeal or even a new trial.

In the end, this case ripped open old wounds about race relations in this country and pardon the cliché, poured gasoline on an always simmering fire that has reignited into a full on five-alarm blaze. A black mother I know on Facebook is hugging her two sons a lot more tightly these days. Here is Ms. Monica Robert's reaction to the verdict. As the jury went into deliberations, Ms. Robert's offered her thoughts on the outcomes and at the time was not feeling very confident about the verdict. Sadly, she was correct.

If you think the black community is overreacting, shut up.

No, seriously, shut up.

They have every right to be mad given how our country treated blacks for over almost 400 years. The American Revolution was fought for our nation's independence, but if you are a person of color or a woman or both, you might see things just a TAD differently. Blacks were classified as three-fifths of a person when the Constitution was first written in 1787. The Civil War gave us the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, but what followed was a period of policies that were based around disenfranchisement and blatant racism by any time period's standards that lasted for nearly a century. We call those policies by this name: Jim Crow. The Civil Rights legislation that overturned Jim Crow has been in place for almost 50 years. However, the recent Supreme Court decision Shelby County, AL v. Holder(2013)struck down disemboweled gutted and eviscerated one of the key legislative policies of that era: the Voting Rights Act of 1965, specifically Section 4.

Chief Justice John Roberts in his opinion stated that, "Our country has changed."

True statement.

HOWEVER.... COMMA...

It hasn't always been for the best and we still have a lot to work at.

New York's WBAI 99.5 FM's Jay Smooth took to twitter with this observation:



The result of this case might cause everyone to look at people who carry firearms a little bit different now. Unless that person is carrying the badge of a legitimate law enforcement agency, how am I to know that person isn't itching to use their firearm just to satisfy some twisted paranoid fantasy that is derived from their irrational fear that everyone is out to get them.

A sad bit of irony is that Zimmerman's brother, Robert Jr., is fearful that a vigilante will come after George Zimmerman in the same way that George did to Trayvon Martin. People are angry over this verdict. I've seen people tweet Zimmerman's address and that is wrong. I condemn anyone who engages in that behavior. If you want to get justice for Trayvon Martin: do it by dumping the controversial "Stand Your Ground" law.

The media's analysis asking who won the case... well, I hate to be the bringer of bad news, but there wasn't a winner in this case. Only losers.

Despite that key piece of evidence and the jury instructions, this was a severe miscarriage of justice. The media has also been running the "Race Riot" meme which to no surprise is nothing more than the typical fear mongering coming from the conservative-Fox News media industrial-complex and has no basis in any reality. As the Time article I linked to stated, again people are angry, but it appears that people are expressing their anger in constructive ways. In the opening to her show last night, Rachel Maddow reported that 100 protestors filled the office of Florida Governor Rick Scott (R) and called on him to push for a special legislative session to tackling this issue.

Most importantly, a family had to bury a child.


Yes, the legal system has spoken and delivered a not guilty verdict. Though that doesn't mean he was innocent. It is a sad state of affairs when the victim in a murder trial is found guilty of his own death. There is really nothing more to do but close with the final two paragraphs from this blog entry:

George Zimmerman killed Trayvon Martin. He doesn’t deny this. George Zimmerman committed homicide against Trayvon Martin. He doesn’t deny this. As of tonight, according to the laws of Florida, and ultimately according to the tenets on which our justice system allegedly perches, George Zimmerman did not murder Trayvon Martin. George Zimmerman has to live with the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teenager. George Zimmerman for the rest of his life has to go to bed every night with the knowledge that he pulled a trigger and killed someone who he falsely suspected was up to no good. Zimmerman was just plain wrong, at every turn. He was wrong to presume Martin was a suspect because he was young and black. He was wrong to get out of the car and pursue Trayvon. He was wrong to instigate a fight he couldn’t win, and he was wrong to kill Trayvon.

Maybe I’m wrong though. Maybe Zimmerman’s accounting of the events is the accurate one. Then again, thanks to George Zimmerman, we’ll always only have a one sided story, because the other side can’t take the witness stand from the grave. In the end, all that’s going matter is that one more mother lost another child to the barrel of a gun. All that’s going to matter is that a young man was killed and the man who admitted to killing him is a free man, and that somehow that means the system actually worked the way it’s designed to.

If that’s not tragedy enough for you, seek help. Immediately.


Monday, 8 July 2013

S#@! MY CONGRESSMAN SAYS




This is my congressman, Representative Michael Burgess (R, TX-26). There are many like him, but this one is mine. Before being elected to Congress, he was an OB/GYN.

Here is his recent thoughts on why the House should pass the highly unconstitutional Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. And the House passed the bill before the events in the Texas Senate, despite the threat of an Obama veto.




This is a subject that I do know something about. There is no question in my mind that a baby at 20-weeks after conception can feel pain. The fact of the matter is, I argue with the chairman because I thought the date was far too late. We should be setting this at 15-weeks, 16-weeks. Watch a sonogram of a 15-week baby, and they have movements that are purposeful. They stroke their face. If they’re a male baby, they may have their hand between their legs. If they feel pleasure, why is it so hard to think that they could feel pain?


Observation 1

Who the (expletive deleted) signed off on his OB/GYN qualifications?! I'm thinking it was Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Goofy, Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, and other popular cartoon characters. Strangely enough, those signatures, except the Goofy one, have the same handwriting patterns..... Hmmmmm....

The person(s) involved in gaffing off gun decking Burgess's card back during his initial training in the 1960s and 1970s should be de-Nukedpermanently disqualified from ever practicing medicine. In addition, Burgess should have his qual card medical license torn up and burned in front of him. Then force his dumbass to re-qualify from a list of approved signatures which I suspect will be no fewer than 99.5% women.


Observation 2

Masturbating fetuses.... that sounds like a late-1970s/early-1980s underground London punk rock band. Didn't they open up for the Sex Pistols once?


Observation 3

Burgess is without a doubt one of the most useless and inept Congressmen in Texas. He once got all-hot-and-bothered over the White House pushing for new standards concerning light bulbs.


You can see him briefly in the PBS Frontline documentary "Obama's Deal," which chronicles the story about how the health care bill got passed. He didn't provide anything substantive to the documentary. I suspect they only interviewed Burgess because he is a doctor. I've attended his town hall meetings. In 2009, I went to two of them. The first was in Denton and it was intimidating. If I was wearing an Obama shirt, it would have incited a riot. The other one was at a church in the Lewisville-Flower Mound area and let me tell you... the anti-Obama sentiment in the air was thick.

In 2011, I was at his town hall meeting where he said he would support jobs for Veterans.... but infrastructure, not so much. At another town hall meeting in August 2011, this time with unhappy Tea Partiers in North Fort Worth, he flirted with the idea of impeaching President Obama brought up by a constituent by stating that "It needs to happen, and I agree with you it would tie things up."

An empty chair would be an improvement over Burgess.

But here's the thing. Burgess is just the tip of the problem and perhaps the general voting public is finally wising up to it. Last week one of Burgess's House colleagues, Trent Franks (R, AZ-9), said this during a hearing:

Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject — because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low.


It is becoming more and more apparent that the Republican Party has not learned a goddamned thing since the last election. In the last two Presidential Elections, Women voters went for Obama. In 2008, Women supported Obama 56-43. Even though Obama won Women 55-44 in 2012, he was able to widen the gender gap from 12 points in 2008 to 18 points in 2012.

In 2012, Women made up 54% of the electorate. I've said it a lot of times: "Studies have shown Women make up at least 50% of the voting public."

We saw what happened in Austin at the end of the first special session. To no one's surprise, Governor Perry called another special session of the Texas Legislature. It wasn't to tackle the problems with the continuing cuts to education, nor the issues of the looming water crisis our state faces, not even trying to find ways to expand Medicaid in the state like what Arizona is doing.

No.

Governor Perry called the first special session to tackle redistricting but then added on the large omnibus anti-abortion bill. Many people swarmed down to Austin to express their distaste for this bill. The highlight was State Senate where Wendy Davis (D, SD-10) of Fort Worth filibustered the bill. She shared stories from various women and other citizens on why this bill should not passed. Sadly the bill passed by a whatever vote. The vote happened after the first special session ended at midnight, but it didn't matter because time had ran out on the session thus killing the bill.

This is more about how the Republican Party clearly has not learned the lessons from the previous presidential election.

That's fine because as shown in the previous election, Women voters have a way to shut the whole thing down.